There’s a commercial currently running on TV that irks me
every time I see it. It is so insulting and annoying that my 60-inch screen now
bears at least a dozen indentations from objects thrown at it whenever this
commercial airs. The spot is for a local station’s news show and quite
effectively advertises the fact that they have no clue what news is.
I find this particularly insulting because I worked very
hard earning a degree in journalism, only to see journalism move from the print
medium to the broadcast medium, where television stations are more interested
in hiring attractive Teleprompter readers with high Q-ratings (a metric testing
how likable the anchor is) than skilled reporters.
In this commercial, the local anchor – whose LinkedIn
profile identifies her as an “investigative reporter” – says her viewers ask
her how they find the news, and she explains “We listen to what people are
talking about.” That’s neither investigative reporting nor news.
Investigative reporting involves research (both online and
offline), cultivating off the record sources, and digging up the stories no one
is talking about. News itself, by the very definition of the word, is something
that is new. A reporter’s job is to INFORM people about the new things they don’t
know about; not to discuss what they are already talking about. Talking about
what people are already talking about and then telling other people about it is
not news reporting; it’s gossiping.
Of course, some newspapers are little more than gossip rags.
You see them at the grocery store checkout counter. But while both are printed
on newsprint, no one would equate The National Enquirer with The New
York Times. But the Enquirer doesn’t pretend to be the Times.
A free press is vital to democracy precisely because of reporters who are
willing to investigate what the public does not know but needs to know, and to
inform the public of what it should be talking about, not to reiterate gossip. The
public needs to know what its leaders are doing behind closed doors; what
factors are impacting the global economy; what health risks are being
downplayed for the sake of corporate profits; and what can be done to alleviate
damage to the planet from global warming, fracking, and deforestation of the
Amazon Rainforest – not more celebrity gossip about the latest antics of Justin
Bieber or Miley Cyrus. As broadcasters move away from “hard news” to “soft news”
in search of higher ratings, the public ignorance is increased to its
detriment. An ignorant populace is easily manipulated by those in power, or
those who seek to be in power.
No comments:
Post a Comment